I have on several occasions posted here about the descent, last spring, of a group of Magnum photographers on Rochester, New York [
1] [
2] [
3].
I work in the city, my son lives there and I live in the nearby
countryside. Yesterday my friend Michael Shaw, perpetrator of the
terrific web site
BagNewsNotes published
this post
questioning some of the award-winning work that emerged from the Magnum
visit. In particular, Michael raised a set of pointed questions about
work by Paolo Pellegrin. I invite readers to head off to (1) view
the work at issue, for which Pellegrin recently won a World Press Photo prize and (2) read Micheal's initial post. You might also have a look at Pellegrin's reply
here, at
this post at
The New York Times and Micheal's response to all the hubbub
here.
I had planned to write a post on this, I even concocted the map above to discuss relevant local matters. But I find that most of what I have to say is covered at the links above. My bottom line? Pellegrin's rationalization of his behavior displays a stunning lack of professionalism backed by obliviousness, excuses and cliches. I think Micheal's defense of the role of
critic undermines the hand-wringing of journalists who think he ought to have contacted Pellegrin prior to making his initial post. I don't think Michael had any obligation to do so and, given Pellegrin's reply, there is no reason to think anything would have been gained had he done so.
*****
Update: This map, accompanying
this story on the fracas in our local newspaper, is much better than mine. It shows the difference having even modest facility with computer graphics can make!
Labels: Critics, Magnum, Pellegrin, photojournalism, Rochester
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home