06 March 2014
Michnik on Russia, Ukraine, Crimea and . . . Elsewhere
__________
* Here is a report about the anti-war protests in Moscow & St. Petersberg that Michnik mentions.
Labels: Adam Michnik, Russia
28 February 2014
The Pussy Riot Media Campaign ~ From Infotainment to Politics
But shortly thereafter, Pussy Riot - including the putatively purged Alyokhina and Tolokonnikova - turned up in Sochi during the Olympics and were not only harassed by local police (accused here of theft from their hotel) and subsequently attacked by whip-wielding Cossacks (report here). This last episode is one Pussy Riot could not have made up. Chatting with Colbert is amusing, fending off Police and Cossacks focuses attention on precisely the matters Pussy Riot aims to subvert. As the MasterCard advert says, for a group protesting ( among other things) religiously based patriarchy, being set upon by uniformed Cossacks is "priceless."
Labels: dissent, Media Politics, Olympics, Pussy Riot, Russia
16 November 2013
Storyville (BBC): Pussy Riot A Punk Prayer
Question: "Does your father support you?"
Nadia: "Yeah, he's the best. I am who I am today because of him"That exchange comes @ 7:37. I hope my baby daughter Esme will say something like that some day.
Labels: Music, protests, Pussy Riot, Russia
12 November 2013
Pyotr Pavlensky's Painful Protest
"Red Square has seen a lot over the centuries, from public executions to giant military parades, but a performance artist broke new ground on Sunday when he nailed his scrotum to cobblestones in a painful act of protest" (source).So, I get why this guy nailing his nuts to the pavement is a protest. But why is it art?
03 November 2013
Nadezhda Tolokonnikova
Labels: dissent, Legal, politics, prisons, Pussy Riot, Russia
23 September 2013
Nadezhda Tolokonnikova - Pussy Riot, Hunger Strike
Labels: dissent, politics, Pussy Riot, Russia
31 July 2013
"I demand that things be called by their names." ~ Nadezhda Tolokonnikova
Labels: dissent, Legal, Pussy Riot, Russia, women's rights
07 July 2013
Amnesty International Graphics
Labels: AI, Amnesty International, China, Graphics, Human Rights, political graphics, Pussy Riot, Russia, torture, Turkey
09 November 2012
Jonathon Keats on Art & Politics
Labels: Ai Weiwei, China, Guerilla Girls, Pussy Riot, Russia
29 September 2012
Pussy Riot Appeal and a Parallel
In an odd parallel, The New York Times reports that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the man thought responsible for the video "Innocence of Muslims" that has inflamed religious passions in recent weeks has been jailed in Los Angeles. He has been detained after a hearing in which he was "charged with eight probation violations." Although Nakoula's video (if it is his) is pathetic, the response of rioters and those who have incited them is as contemptible. And the court here is clearly relying on legal technicalities to punish Nakoula for his alleged expression of studied ignorance and bigotry.
Labels: Human Rights, Legal, Music, politics, Pussy Riot, Russia, women
28 August 2012
Not Just Pussy Riot ~ Taisiya Osipova
Labels: dissent, Legal, Pussy Riot, Russia
21 August 2012
Pussy Riot, Liberalism, Hypocrisy
"How many fans of Pussy Riot’s zany “punk prayer” in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova’s erudite and moving closing statement were equally thrilled by her participation, naked and heavily pregnant, in a public orgy at a Moscow museum in 2008? That performance, by the radical art group Voina (Russian for “war”), was meant to illustrate how Russians were abused by their government. Voina had previously set fire to a police car and drew obscene images on a St. Petersburg drawbridge.
Stunts like that would get you arrested just about anywhere, not just in authoritarian Russia. But Pussy Riot and its comrades at Voina come as a full package: You can’t have the fun, pro-democracy, anti-Putin feminism without the incendiary anarchism, extreme sexual provocations, deliberate obscenity and hard-left politics." - Vadim Nikitim
I have to say that I found this scolding Op-Ed by Vadim Nikitin truly, ridiculously offensive. Why? Not because there are not many sanctimonious liberals who simply want to chastise far-away regimes for transgressions of the sort they wrongly believe never, ever occur here in the US. There are, of course, many liberals of just that sort. What is offensive about Nakim's argument (and Glenn Greeenwald's endorsement of it at The Guardian) is that there are many Americans who (1) speak regularly and loudly about transgressions by public - and private - powers in the US, (2) are quite aware that the women of Pussy Riot have been involved in provocative - some might say 'tasteless' or 'offensive' - performances in the past, and (3) nevertheless not only find it outrageous that the Russians are still running show-trials to rival those of the Stalin years but feel obliged to say so.
A couple of things are important. First, Nikitim is right that protests of the sort Pussy Riot has staged might well get one arrested in many places other than Russia. But would they also get one a show trial and multi-year sentence - serious prison time? Second, the orthodox church is busy supporting the oligarchic Russian regime, and it is naive to assume otherwise. Just as when ACT-UP New York staged protests during the church services of Cardinal O'Connor, the Russian activists are identifying church complicity with oppressive policies. Imagine gay kiss-ins during holy mass! Third, Greenwald is off the mark when he invokes Chomsky's moralism. Sure the US is especially egregious in perpetrating violence world-wide. That in no way implies that we should sit on our hands when other regimes follow suit. And, of course, when liberals support 'freedom of expression' in cases like this, it becomes easy to turn the outrage around next time they demur in the face of domestic outrages.
________________
P.S.: A follow up. It would also be a mistake to assume that all Russians support the show trial prosecution. Consider this observation from The Nation: "Support has come from inside Russia and abroad. More than 40,000 Russians have signed an online petition protesting the band members’ arrest and detention. A hundred Russian civic and cultural figures have petitioned the country’s Supreme Court. Russia’s human rights ombudsperson has urged their release."
Labels: Human Rights, hypocrisy, Pussy Riot, Russia
07 August 2012
Pussy Riot Update
Labels: Legal, Pussy Riot, Russia
06 August 2012
Some Interesting Things to Read
In Dissent, Rebecca Solnit argues the case for debt relief for young folks who've incurred burdensome student loan debt.
In The Guardian last Friday this update on the Moscow show trial of Pussy Riot on charges of hooliganism.
Amartya Sen in The New Republic, writing on the apparent demise of Europe, and especially on how the neglect of democracy and the demands of social justice has contributed to to the problem.
And a couple of posts at the Economix Blog (The NY Times) by Simon Johnson here and here on the serious need for regulation of financial markets and on the tall tales bankers tell as they try to derail that prospect.
Labels: Amartya Sen, debt, Israel, Legal, political economy, Rebecca Solnit, Russia
03 August 2012
Pussy Riot Trial
Back in 1970s in what then was Czechoslovakia, Václav Havel coordinated respectable "dissidents" around the cause of the Plastic People of the Universe, a rock band engaged in what the Communist regime regarded as politically inappropriate performances and events. Today in Russia, members of the rock band Pussy Riot are imprisoned while on trial on charges of "hooliganism" and respectable, churchgoing opinion seems to be that the ladies are guilty and stand in need of punishment. You can read a report here in The New York Times and find an archive of articles here at The Guardian. The take away is not that Putin seems to have endorsed leniency in the case, but that the women face seven years in prison for making a political statement. This is the new "democratic" Russia.
Labels: dissent, Music, Pussy Riot, Russia, Václav Havel
01 June 2012
Portraits of Opposition (Russia) ~ Davide Monteleone
Photograph © Davide Monteleone.
The folks at The New Yorker have run this brief post consisting of a baker's dozen of portraits Davide Monteleone has made of various political and cultural opposition groupings in contemporary Russia.
27 January 2012
On the Uses of Bridges for (Democratic) Politics



At The Guardian today is this report on various extremely creative protests against authorities in Russia. Among the most creative is pictured in the sequence images above. It is a really big penis hastily painted by the group Voina on a drawbridge in St. Petersburg. As the bridge was raised the member appeared to become aroused and poked out directly facing the building housing the headquarters of the Federal Security Service (FSB). Apparently, the bridge stays up for several hours each night to facilitate traffic on the river.You can more detailed report on the June 2010 action - apparently entitled "Dick Captured by the FSB" - in an earlier piece here in The Guardian, here at Der Spiegel and here at The New York Times. Among the fun facts revealed there are that last April the Russian Ministry of Culture awarded Voina a €10K contemporary art prize for this "project" and that, subsequently, a Russian Court issued an international arrest warrant for Oleg Vorotnikov, one of the group's leaders, on charges of hooliganism. That has prompted solidarity protests like the one captured in the image below of the Charles Bridge in Prague last November.
Having said all of that, it is important to keep one's focus on the politics here and not write all this off as silliness, just the antics of idiosyncratic personalities. This is not, in other words, a matter of aesthetics or of law - those are the terms in which the Culture Ministry and the Courts respectively frame Voina's actions. What is at stake, and what Voina calls attention to, is the lack freedom and democracy in Russia.
13 December 2011
Democracy Now ~ Russia
Photograph © Platon.
14 May 2007
Kidnapping as a Political Weapon (2)
"Johnston’s may be the big story this year, but it’s by no means the only one: indeed, surveys of freedom of the press have discovered a depressing trend as more and more people are now living under regimes where journalistic freedom is either unprotected, or actively attacked, by government.
In Russia, investigative journalist Anna Politkovskaya was murdered, apparently for digging too deep in to the government’s dirty war in Chechnya.
In the Philippines, six journalists were killed last year, and police have done little to stop the wave of threats and harassment media workers face. Environmental journalist Joey Estriber was kidnapped in March, like Alan Johnston. To date, the police have failed even to mount a search for him.
In Zimbabwe, cameraman Edward Chikomba was abducted and murdered, apparently because he had filmed the violent conduct of the security forces during anti-government protests.
In Turkey, the resurgence of the nationalist, statist right has created an atmosphere where journalists and authors fear to voice their opinions. Nobel Laureate Orhan Pamuk has left the country: Agos editor Hrant Dink decided to stay, and was assassinated on 19 January.
The list goes on. And it’s getting longer."
Alan Johnston's life is still in danger. Joey Estriber's may be as well. And as this list shows they is not alone. As I wrote earlier: "kidnapping is not a legitimate tool of politics; it is a tool of terror. It is inexcusable and unjustifiable regardless of whether it is carried out by shadowy non-state actors or by governments as a matter of policy" I couldn't say it better myself.
__________
PS: For more information as well as suggestions for individual responses and political action visit Reporters Without Borders / Reporters sans Frontieres / Reporteros sin Fronteras
Labels: Gaza, Hrant Dink, Kidnapping, Pamuk, Philippines, Russia, Turkey, Zimbabwe






















